|
|
|
Increasingly, states are developing, and the U.S. Department
of Education is approving, Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) plans
that incorporate growth model approaches where districts receive
credit for demonstrating that specific cohorts of students are
demonstrating achievement gains across years. In contrast to the
“status model” of No child Left Behind (NCLB), which makes
accountability decisions by comparing the percentage of students
meeting proficiency targets each year, growth models track
individual students’ progress, and can provide a more accurate
picture of whether a school is succeeding in helping its
students develop essential proficiencies.
For example, the illustration below shows students' growth from
one year to the next on the state assessment.
All of the students started out the first year in the lowest
performance category, Level 1. A status trend model would show
that only Kate grew from one year to the next, because she is
the only student who moved from Level 1 to Level 2. However, as
can be seen in the illustration, both David and Maria made
significant gains within the Level 1 performance category.
Additionally, John dropped in his performance from one year to
the next.
There is a wide range in the types of longitudinal methods
currently used to analyze individual student growth. PCG-CRM
offers consulting services on the methodological and statistical
modeling requirements of different growth models and how growth
and status models can be used with each other.
Our team of statisticians, data analysts, and measurement experts conduct multi-year growth studies and provide user-friendly reports to help educators:
- Use the results to examine program effectiveness
- Identify schools that are more effective in helping improve academic performance
- Target instructional intervention efforts more effectively
Districts with large populations of students at low levels of
reading and mathematics literacy are also becoming interested in
how growth models can be used to determine if program efforts to
improve achievement are resulting in achievement gains for
specific student subgroups. PCG-CRM assists districts in
selecting and implementing a growth model approach that is most
aligned with a district's goals and resources. PCG-CRM also
offers consulting services on the use of gains analysis
methodologies that provide districts with robust evidence of the
progress of students in specific programs, and allow a
results-oriented approach to examining instructional
effectiveness.
|
|